<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Facebook vs. MySpace Smackdown: Should You Care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pivotalbrands.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/the-facebook-vs-myspace-smackdown-should-you-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pivotalbrands.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/the-facebook-vs-myspace-smackdown-should-you-care/</link>
	<description>A blog about branding professional services from Hinge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:07:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://pivotalbrands.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/the-facebook-vs-myspace-smackdown-should-you-care/#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pivotalbrands.wordpress.com/?p=462#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>Personally, I believe Twitter is doomed to fail as the social media arena evolves. The very nature of their business is about quick bursts of information which is not conducive to long-term communication. Tweets are too short and detached. It&#039;s endless banter with no real hope of being able to have a deeper conversation, and that&#039;s why Facebook and MySpace are more reliable platforms. A business can send out quick bursts, but have the opportunity to delve deeper if needed.

IF Twitter is to survive, they have to A) specialize; and B) develop a reliable revenue stream.

My two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I believe Twitter is doomed to fail as the social media arena evolves. The very nature of their business is about quick bursts of information which is not conducive to long-term communication. Tweets are too short and detached. It&#8217;s endless banter with no real hope of being able to have a deeper conversation, and that&#8217;s why Facebook and MySpace are more reliable platforms. A business can send out quick bursts, but have the opportunity to delve deeper if needed.</p>
<p>IF Twitter is to survive, they have to A) specialize; and B) develop a reliable revenue stream.</p>
<p>My two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lfrederiksen</title>
		<link>http://pivotalbrands.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/the-facebook-vs-myspace-smackdown-should-you-care/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>lfrederiksen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pivotalbrands.wordpress.com/?p=462#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>
You make a great point.Initial adoption is a poor measure of effectiveness. I wonder what is the best use of Twitter?....lwf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a great point.Initial adoption is a poor measure of effectiveness. I wonder what is the best use of Twitter?&#8230;.lwf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://pivotalbrands.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/the-facebook-vs-myspace-smackdown-should-you-care/#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pivotalbrands.wordpress.com/?p=462#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>Lee,

Some good points are made here. However, I have to question the assertion that Twitter, specifically, is &quot;holding it&#039;s own.&quot; It&#039;s quite possible you have seen the Neilsen Company&#039;s study already, but here&#039;s a quick snippet of their findings:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Currently, more than 60 percent of U.S. Twitter users fail to return the following month, or in other words, Twitter’s audience retention rate, or the percentage of a given month’s users who come back the following month, is currently about 40 percent. For most of the past 12 months, Twitter has languished below 30 percent retention.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Source: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/twitter-quitters-post-roadblock-to-long-term-growth/

Given the findings, Twitter&#039;s &quot;impressive growth&quot; (at the current time) rings hollow. As a result, I&#039;m not sure anyone should classify Twitter as a strong business application just yet. The ROI on Twitter, it appears, may be far less than hoped if one&#039;s readers/followers are dropping like flies.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee,</p>
<p>Some good points are made here. However, I have to question the assertion that Twitter, specifically, is &#8220;holding it&#8217;s own.&#8221; It&#8217;s quite possible you have seen the Neilsen Company&#8217;s study already, but here&#8217;s a quick snippet of their findings:</p>
<blockquote><p>Currently, more than 60 percent of U.S. Twitter users fail to return the following month, or in other words, Twitter’s audience retention rate, or the percentage of a given month’s users who come back the following month, is currently about 40 percent. For most of the past 12 months, Twitter has languished below 30 percent retention.</p></blockquote>
<p>Source: <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/twitter-quitters-post-roadblock-to-long-term-growth/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/twitter-quitters-post-roadblock-to-long-term-growth/</a></p>
<p>Given the findings, Twitter&#8217;s &#8220;impressive growth&#8221; (at the current time) rings hollow. As a result, I&#8217;m not sure anyone should classify Twitter as a strong business application just yet. The ROI on Twitter, it appears, may be far less than hoped if one&#8217;s readers/followers are dropping like flies.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
